no limit vs. pot limit

[imaboss.]

see i love omaha hi because you dont lose all your chips neccesarily in one hand but you can still get significant pot when you have a big hand

but like razz limit i just cant stand

[zerocloud1]

in razz i think is the most easy to bluff.. i've got couple of people fold it couple of time when they think i got better card inside along with all good card showing.

[imaboss.]

well its not because of the actual game that i hate razz
its the long time its takes and the fact that it doesn't really exicte me much at all

[zerocloud1]

yeah i know limit take long time, but in general there are usually less people playing for real money in limit game like stud, razz.. i think most people went to play hold 'em and omaha more.

[imaboss.]

i just don't see razz ever becoming really popluar....especially due to the fact its limit
America just tends to favor no limit games

[floppinthenuts]

thats true ima, when you click on razz tab at tilt theres like 15 players if that. click on holdem theres tons

[zerocloud1]

yeah exactly but there are some people who have skill to play just about general. i think i can handle hold em, razz and maybe stud, but hi/low split or omaha isn't my thing i get a little confused on it somehow.

[imaboss.]

well the thing is when i play horse....

i tend to lose focus....and i lose pots in stud razz and hi/lo that i thought i had won

i mean i can play every game, just limit ones is where i usually make mistakes

[zerocloud1]

yeah. i do fairly alright in HORSE. it just omaha HI/LOW, stud hi/low is kinda hurt me with the split pots when we broke even from high ranks and low balls

[tyttus]

HORSE is pretty nice to play...
but sometimes get confused.... and i dont see that the game has changed, and end up messing things up =]